Late Renal Allograft Dysfunction
Bethesda Marriott
Bethesda, MD
July 15, 2004 Summary
Over the last decade, the incidence of ESRD has increased at a faster rate than the availability of kidney donors (USRDS 2003 Annual Data Report). As a result, the rate of kidney transplants per 100 patient years on dialysis has declined steadily. Although renal allograft and recipient survivals have also increased during the last decade, over the last several years one-year graft survival and allograft half-life are largely unchanged.
Despite effective immunosuppressive strategies that have markedly reduced rates of early allograft failure over time, occurrence of late renal allograft loss remains a significant problem in the transplant patient population. The number of patients returning to dialysis therapy each year has nearly doubled in the last decade, as approximately 4,500 patients with failed transplants restarted dialysis in 2001 (USRDS). Such patients represented approximately 4.7% of the total number of patients starting or restarting dialysis in 2001.
Observations from clinical studies suggest that in addition to cellular and humorally-mediated allograft rejection, other non-immunologically-mediated factors likely contribute to progressive loss of kidney function in transplant recipients. Donor factors such as age and cadaveric status, as well as transplant characteristics such as form of preservation and vascular anatomy also contribute to progressive renal dysfunction. In addition, recipient factors such as hypertension, vascular disease, proteinuria, drug exposure, and post-transplant infections likely play a role in late allograft failure.
In view of the apparent trends for late renal allograft loss, and the increasing incidence of chronic kidney disease and ESRD in this patient population, NIDDK and NIAID are sponsoring a workshop to discuss immunologic and non-immunologic factors that influence late allograft outcome. Clinical investigators interested in late renal allograft dysfunction will discuss the current understanding of the problem, outline important questions that should be studied, and recommend strategies for future investigations. Agenda
| Draft Agenda as of April 9, 2004 |
| 7:30am
| Registration, Continental Breakfast & Introductions
|
| | Late Renal Allograft Loss Chair: Phillip Halloran
|
| 8:00am | Clinical Definition, Risk Factors & Rationale for a Classification Lawrence Hunsicker
|
| 8:30am | The Pediatric Perspective on Late Renal Allograft Loss William Harmon
|
| 9:00am | Histopathologic Lessons from Late Renal Allograft Loss Robert Colvin
|
| 9:30am | Discussion
|
| | Allograft Injury -Mechanisms and Renal Response Chair: Arthur Matas
|
| 10:00am | Progression of Renal Injury after Transplant Sundaram Hariharan
|
| 10:20am | AlloAntibody-Mediated Injury Paul Terasaki
|
| 10:40am | Immunosuppression William Bennett
|
| 11:00am | Renal Allograft Response to Injury Phillip Halloran
|
| 11:20am | BK Virus and Late Allograft Function Roslyn Mannon
|
| 11:40am | Working Lunch with Discussion
|
| | Utilty of Databases Chair: Lawrence Hunsiker
|
| 1:00pm | Tools for Transplant Research Bertram Kasiske
|
| 1:20pm | The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Robert Merion
|
| 1:50pm | Lessons from Studies of CKD Joseph Coresh
|
| 2:10pm | Discussion
|
| | Group Discussions on Clinical Studies of Late Allograft Loss Chair: William Harmon
|
| 2:30pm | Endpoints & Study Designs to Evaluate Renal Allograft Loss Arthur Matas
|
| 2:40pm | Protocol Biopsies and Analyses & Sample Repositories Allan Kirk
|
| 2:50pm | In Search of Biomarkers or Surrogate Measures of Reduced Renal Function or Rejection Microarrays Minnie Sarwal
|
| 3:00pm | In Search of Biomarkers or Surrogate Measures of Reduced Renal Function or Rejection Small Molecules Peter Nickerson
|
| 3:10pm | Discussion
|
| 4:00pm | Summary (Kirk & Meyers) |
Page last updated: January 01, 0001